Tips to decrease Manuscript rejection rates: Peertechz

Manuscripts rejection is very discouraging to scholars who spend years planning their research, securing funding, compiling and analyzing data, and making sound conclusions that could benefit their readers. Knowing the most common reasons for rejection helps to ensure that manuscript receives a thorough review so that scholars can address any concerns and resubmit.
Peertechz.com has come up with practical suggestions for budding authors on how to achieve success when writing and submitting manuscripts to the International Open Access Journals.
“Differing to popular belief, no editor likes to reject submissions”, states Ravi Kiran, Commissioning Editor, Peertechz.com.
It might be interesting to learn the measures Reviewers consider to accept manuscripts for publication:
1) The importance, timeliness, relevance, and prevalence of the problem addressed;
2) The quality of the writing style (well‐written, clear, straightforward, easy to follow, and logical);
3) The study design applied (that the design is appropriate, rigorous, and comprehensive);
4) The degree to which the literature review is thoughtful, focused, and up‐to‐date; and
5) The use of a sufficiently large sample.
The following are the top reasons for papers rejection:
1) Inappropriate, incomplete, or insufficiently described statistics;
2) Over‐interpretation of results;
3) Use of inappropriate, suboptimal, or insufficiently described populations or instruments;
4) Small or biased samples; and
5) Text that is poorly written or difficult to follow.
Many accomplished authors write their results first, followed by an introduction and discussion, in an attempt to “stay true” to their results and not to wander into additional areas. Typically the last two portions to be written are the conclusion and the abstract.
It may be helpful to follow the IMRD format for writing scientific manuscripts. This abbreviation stands for the sections contained within the article: Introduction, Methods, Results, and Discussion.
Clear communication of the findings of the research is essential to the growth and development of science and professional practice. Failure to publish important findings significantly diminishes the potential impact that these findings may have on clinical practice.
Authors should realize the fact that successful production of a written product for submission to a peer‐reviewed scientific journal requires substantial efforts. Such an effort can be maximized by following above-mentioned aspects when composing or creating the product for submission. By following suggested guidelines and avoiding common errors, the budding authors can streamline their manuscripts publication process.

Peertechz.com publishes online journals related to science and Medicine. At present, we have more than 100 scholarly journals with broadening the scope to publish high-quality original research papers, case reports, and other manuscripts. We promote scientific research with the help of stringent Peer-Review process. We are empowered by the eminent group of editors and reviewers. We foster the open-access policy strongly and offer unrestricted access to the papers published, reproduction and distribution of the manuscripts in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Peertechz Publications Private Limited
#202, NVS Central, Gayatri Nagar
Hi-tech City, R.R District
Hyderabad-500018, TS, INDIA
Tel: +91 40 23833479
www.peertechz.com
email: Info@Peertechz.com

This release was published on openPR.