Insolvency: BGH bolsters creditors‘ rights
According to insolvency avoidance law, the insolvency administrator can reclaim payments made by the insolvent debtor from the period prior to insolvency. This has resulted in legal uncertainty for payees and in some cases given rise to excessive burdens. We at the commercial law firm GRP Rainer Rechtsanwälte note that the BGH has since strengthened the position of creditors with its recent ruling.
The Karlsruhe judges held that just because a creditor is successful in forcibly enforcing a claim, it cannot be assumed from this that the creditor was aware of the debtor’s insolvency or cessation of payments if the creditor otherwise had no knowledge of specific circumstances pertaining to the insolvency or the debtor’s financial situation. The insolvency administrator cannot therefore automatically reclaim the forcibly collected debt.
In the instant case, the creditor had submitted the invoice in October 2007. Despite several reminders, the debtor had still not settled the invoice. Consequently, an application for provisional garnishment was made in June 2008. The creditor received his money shortly thereafter. The debtor finally filed for insolvency in October. The insolvency administrator then demanded that the amount be paid back by way of a challenge to transactions whose intention the administrator believed to have been to disadvantage creditors.
There is a presumption pursuant to the German Insolvency Act (Insolvenzordnung) that the creditor was aware of the debtor’s intention if he knew that the debtor’s insolvency was imminent and that the action disadvantaged the other creditors. To this end, it is sufficient for the creditor to have been cognisant of the cessation of payments. Notwithstanding this, the BGH ruled that it cannot be readily concluded that there was knowledge of the insolvency or cessation of payments if the creditor fully redeemed his only claim shortly after successfully contending for a default judgment and otherwise had no knowledge of the debtor’s insolvency or financial situation.
In insolvency cases, creditors and debtors can seek advice from lawyers who are versed in the field of company law to preserve their interests.
GRP Rainer LLP www.grprainer.com/en/ is an international firm of lawyers and tax advisors who are specialists in commercial law. The firm counsels commercial and industrial companies and corporations, as well as associations, small- and mid-sized businesses, self-employed freelancers and private individuals worldwide from offices Cologne, Berlin, Bonn, Dusseldorf, Frankfurt, Hamburg, Munich, Stuttgart and London UK.
Contact Michael Rainer
Lawyer, Managing Partner
GRP Rainer LLP
Phone: +49 221-27 22 75-0
This release was published on openPR.
Permanent link to this press release:
Please set a link in the press area of your homepage to this press release on openPR. openPR disclaims liability for any content contained in this release.
You can edit or delete your press release Insolvency: BGH bolsters creditors‘ rights here
News-ID: 756741 • Views: 1893
More Releases from GRP Rainer LLP
GRP Rainer Rechtsanwälte – Experience in establishing companies
Choosing the right corporate form when establishing a company can contribute a great deal to the economic success of the business. We at the commercial law firm GRP Rainer Rechtsanwälte advise numerous businesses on company formation and takeovers as well as in the event of a change of partners or shareholders. In our experience, the partners or shareholders frequently neglect one critical point amidst all the euphoria: choosing the right corporate
OLG Köln: Will written with non-dominant hand valid
It is possible for a will to be valid even if it was written with the hand one does not normally write with. That was the verdict of the Oberlandesgericht (OLG) Köln [Higher Regional Court of Cologne] in its ruling of August 3, 2017 (Az.: 2 Wx 149/17). In addition to preparing a notarized will, a testamentary disposition can also be handwritten. To this end, the will needs to be written
OLG Köln: Only serious misconduct justifies withdrawal from contract of inherit …
Apart from a will, it is also possible to prepare a contract of inheritance as a way of organizing one’s estate. It should be noted, however, that a contract of inheritance has a significantly stronger binding effect. In the absence of a will or contract of inheritance, the rules of intestate succession apply automatically following the death of the testator. If these run contrary to the testator’s wishes, a testamentary disposition
Commercial agent’s claim for compensation following voluntary termination
A commercial agent may even be entitled to compensation if he or she voluntarily issues notice of termination. However, the company’s conduct needs to give rise to legitimate grounds for termination for this to happen. When a commercial agency agreement is brought to an end, the commercial agent often has a right to compensation. This is because the company in a lot of cases continues to profit from the client contacts
More Releases for BGH
Hydroponic Equipment Market Size to 2023 Focusing on General Hydroponics, Botani …
Hydroponic Equipment market analysis mainly introduces the changing market dynamics in terms of covering all details inside analysis and opinion, volume and value market share by players, by regions, by product type, by consumers and their price change details, cost/revenue structure. Additionally, the analysis of Hydroponic Equipment offers a detailed breakdown of key market growth drivers and limitation along with impact analysis of the same. ICR World’s Hydroponic Equipment market research
Global Bright steel bar market 2017 - Omega Bright Steel, BGH Edelstahl, Midland …
Apex Market Reports, recently published a detailed market research study focused on the "Bright steel bar Market" across the global, regional and country level. The report provides 360° analysis of "Bright steel bar Market" from view of manufacturers, regions, product types and end industries. The research report analyses and provides the historical data along with current performance of the global Bright steel bar industry, and estimates the future trend of
BGH: Health claims in relation to mineral water need to comply with the Health C …
Health claims in relation to mineral water need to be consistent with the Health Claims Regulation. This was confirmed by the Bundesgerichtshof (BGH), Germany’s Federal Supreme Court, in its ruling of January 30, 2017 (Az.: I ZR 257/15). Advertising featuring health claims pertaining to mineral water also needs to adhere to the requirements set out in the Health Claims Regulation. That was the verdict of the Bundesgerichtshof with respect to an
BGH: Notarized agreement decisive, not the draft agreement
In cases of doubt, it is the notarized agreement that counts and not a draft contract whose content deviates from the former. That was the verdict of the Bundesgerichtshof (BGH), Germany’s Federal Supreme Court, in its judgment of June 10, 2016 (Az.: V ZR 295/14). GRP Rainer Lawyers and Tax Advisors in Cologne, Berlin, Bonn, Düsseldorf, Frankfurt, Hamburg, Munich, Stuttgart and London conclude: A purchase agreement for real estate needs
Eye-catching advertising featuring misleading guarantee promises
Advertising featuring a guarantee can be misleading if the guarantee promise is linked to conditions that are not clearly visible to consumers. That was the verdict of the Landgericht (LG) Frankfurt [Regional Court of Frankfurt]. GRP Rainer Lawyers and Tax Advisors in Cologne, Berlin, Bonn, Düsseldorf, Frankfurt, Hamburg, Munich, Stuttgart and London conclude: Clear guidelines relating to what is termed “Blickfangwerbung” (attention-grabbing/eye-catching advertising) had already been set out by the Bundesgerichtshof
Remedying defects and shifting the burden of proof: BGH bolsters buyers’ right …
The Bundesgerichtshof (BGH), Germany’s Federal Court of Justice, has strengthened the rights of buyers and consumers in two recent rulings in the event of defects occurring in the object of sale (Az.: VIII ZR 103/15 and VIII ZR 240/15). GRP Rainer Lawyers and Tax Advisors in Cologne, Berlin, Bonn, Düsseldorf, Frankfurt, Hamburg, Munich, Stuttgart and London conclude: Both cases before the Bundesgerichtshof concerned defects in used vehicles that did not appear