openPR Logo
Press release

Vinkler Law Offices, Ltd. Secures $13.5 Million Settlement in Cook County Medical Malpractice Case

01-29-2026 08:47 AM CET | Politics, Law & Society

Press release from: Vinkler Law Offices, ltd.

On January 8, 2026, Jerome A. Vinkler of Vinkler Law Offices, Ltd. obtained a $13,500,000 confidential settlement in a Cook County medical malpractice case involving a catastrophic surgical injury that resulted in an above-the-knee amputation for a 49-year-old man.

The Plaintiff went to a major Chicagoland Hospital for an anterior approach total hip arthroplasty surgery on October 18, 2023. When the orthopedic surgeon began the surgery, he transected the deep femoral artery, resulting in the loss of a total of 6,000 ccs of blood that required a full blood transfusion. When attempting to cauterize the artery, mistaking it for a minor artery, he cut another major artery. When a clot occurred, he wrongly presumed he cauterized an artery. It took over one hour for the surgeon to stabilize the Plaintiff, and a vascular surgeon was never called during the operation.

After the bleeding was controlled, the orthopedic surgeon decided to continue with the hip replacement surgery, despite the amount of blood loss, without consulting with a vascular surgeon, and attempted to ligate the transected arteries himself instead. After the surgery, he also failed to check the Plaintiff's peripheral pulses before leaving the operating room. This is crucial because these arteries and vessels run very close to the hip joint, and they were damaged during the procedure. Checking the pulses would help early detection of vascular compromise to prevent permanent injury or limb loss, which both occurred to the Plaintiff after his hip replacement. This is below the standard of care and could have been avoided if a vascular surgeon had been consulted after the transection and the patient's peripheral pulses had been checked.

The Plaintiff's right leg suffered from ischemia for the next 4-8 hours after surgery. The subsequent return of blood flow led to a reperfusion injury with kidney failure and considerable risk of infection.

The hip replacement surgery started at 9:30 AM and stopped at 11:00 AM. The first consultation with a vascular surgeon was not until 7:55 PM that evening. At 8:45 PM, a vascular surgeon team performed a right leg thrombectomy with right leg angiogram and repair of the right femoral artery, including ligation of the transected deep femoral artery. The Plaintiff was then taken directly to the ICU, intubated, and in critical condition.

On October 19, 2023, the Plaintiff developed rhabdomyolysis, acute renal insufficiency requiring hemodialysis, acute right lower extremity ischemia, and remained in critical condition.

On October 20, 2023, the Plaintiff was also diagnosed with compartment syndrome of the right thigh, and an emergency fasciotomy was performed on his right leg. Four days after the fasciotomy, the Plaintiff was unable to move his right lower leg and was in extreme pain. On October 26, 2023, they extended the right calf fasciotomy.

The Plaintiff asked to be transferred to another major Chicagoland Hospital on November 1, 2023, for more specialized care. During this time, his situation worsened, and the Plaintiff had to undergo an above-the-knee amputation of his left leg. The hip prosthesis had to be removed due to infection and purulent drainage from the right groin.

On January 13, 2024, the Plaintiff was finally discharged with a wound vac and in extreme pain.

After this incident, the Plaintiff has seen numerous surgeons to try to have a hip replacement. He has been turned down by every orthopedic surgeon he has seen because of the damage that took place on October 18, 2023. He continues pain management. A prosthetic leg is useless because of the pain of bearing any amount of weight on his right side. He uses a wheelchair. Judge Harmening (ret.) helped to mediate this settlement.

This case settled after the Plaintiff's deposition. A review of cases settled before trial shows this is the highest settlement involving an above-the-knee amputation in the ten-year search.

According to Mr. Vinkler, "This record-setting settlement was accomplished in just one afternoon. We were helped by the efforts of Judge Ed Harmening (ret.). Our client will be able to obtain the help he needs, and he told me he felt he had obtained justice."

Vinkler Law Offices represents Plaintiffs injured in personal injury matters for catastrophic injury and wrongful death, including medical malpractice, product liability, drug litigation, trucking crash, construction, and nursing home matters.

7045 Veterans Blvd, Suite A2, Burr Ridge, Illinois 60527

As one of the leading personal injury law firms in Chicago, we are dedicated to providing top-rated legal representation in the concentrated areas of catastrophic injury and wrongful death.

This release was published on openPR.

Permanent link to this press release:

Copy
Please set a link in the press area of your homepage to this press release on openPR. openPR disclaims liability for any content contained in this release.

You can edit or delete your press release Vinkler Law Offices, Ltd. Secures $13.5 Million Settlement in Cook County Medical Malpractice Case here

News-ID: 4365646 • Views:

More Releases for Plaintiff

Lanier Law Firm Legal Team Representing Plaintiff Against NBA Star Zion Williams …
Hackney Publications announced today that the three attorneys from the Lanier Law Firm that are representing a plaintiff, who claims NBA Star Zion Williamson sexually assaulted her, appeared on the Sports Law Expert Podcast. The segment can be heard here - https://creators.spotify.com/pod/profile/holt-hackney/episodes/A-visit-with-Sports-Lawyers-Rachel-Lanier--Sarah-Lanier-and-Sam-Taylor-of-Lanier-Law-Firm-e35q1jc. The participating attorneys were Rachel Lanier, Sarah Lanier and Sam E. Taylor. "These attorneys from the highly respected Lanier Law Firm did a fantastic job of explaining the issues associated with
Manhattan Divorce Lawyer Richard Roman Shum Explains the Role of the Plaintiff i …
Navigating divorce proceedings in New York requires a clear understanding of legal roles, including the distinction between the plaintiff and the defendant. Richard Roman Shum (https://www.romanshum.com/blog/who-is-the-plaintiff-in-a-divorce-in-new-york/), a Manhattan divorce lawyer at the Law Office of Richard Roman Shum, Esq., provides insight into who the plaintiff is in a divorce and the responsibilities associated with initiating the process. A plaintiff in a divorce case is the spouse who files the divorce petition,
Manhattan Divorce Lawyer Richard Roman Shum Sheds Light on the Role of the Plain …
Manhattan divorce lawyer Richard Roman Shum (https://www.romanshum.com/blog/who-is-the-plaintiff-in-a-divorce-in-new-york/) of the Law Office of Richard Roman Shum, recently published an insightful article titled 'Who is the Plaintiff in a Divorce?' The article serves as a valuable resource for individuals navigating the complexities of divorce, providing clarity on what it means to be the plaintiff and how this position influences the course of the legal process. In this new article, the Manhattan divorce lawyer
Pre and Post Settlement Plaintiff Funding Market to Witness Stunning Growth to G …
Market Research, INC. has recently published a report on Pre and Post Settlement Plaintiff Funding market which is an essential tool for businesses to gather critical insights about their target markets, competitors, and industry trends. With the increasing complexity of the global business environment, companies need accurate and up-to-date information to make informed decisions and stay ahead of the competition. That's why we are excited to announce the release of
Plaintiff in Alleged Police Brutality Lawsuit Struggles to Raise Awareness
– The owner of an anti-police misconduct website that invites people to post their stories about bad experiences with law enforcement is now the plaintiff in a police brutality lawsuit against Multnomah County, its sheriff, and several deputies. CopBlaster.com founder Cyrus Sullivan has attempted to raise awareness of this lawsuit with the hopes of finding more people that claim to be victims of the defendants in the case, but so
Wright Conserve Hip Implant Lawsuit Plaintiff Seeks Consolidation of Cases
Los Angeles, CA, December 22, 2011 – One of the plaintiffs who filed a personal injury lawsuit against Wright Medical Technologies Inc. over a faulty hip implant is asking a federal judge to consolidate the cases for pretrial proceedings. If the U.S. Panel on Multidistrict Litigation grants the motion, the cases will be heading to trial in the Northern or Southern District Court of Georgia. Plaintiff Danny James claims that