openPR Logo
Press release

Remedying defects and shifting the burden of proof: BGH bolsters buyers’ rights

01-18-2017 01:25 PM CET | Politics, Law & Society

Press release from: GRP Rainer LLP

Remedying defects and shifting the burden of proof: BGH bolsters

The Bundesgerichtshof (BGH), Germany’s Federal Court of Justice, has strengthened the rights of buyers and consumers in two recent rulings in the event of defects occurring in the object of sale (Az.: VIII ZR 103/15 and VIII ZR 240/15).

GRP Rainer Lawyers and Tax Advisors in Cologne, Berlin, Bonn, Düsseldorf, Frankfurt, Hamburg, Munich, Stuttgart and London conclude: Both cases before the Bundesgerichtshof concerned defects in used vehicles that did not appear until after the purchase was made. In the case of the proceedings with the reference VIII ZR 103/15, a defect occurred in the vehicle’s automatic gearbox. The buyer set the dealer a deadline for the purposes of remedying the defect, but to no avail. The consumer ultimately rescinded the purchase agreement and sued for repayment of the purchase price.

Unlike the courts of lower instance, which held that the buyer had not adduced sufficient evidence proving that the defect had been present at the time the purchase was made, the BGH ruled in his favour. The Karlsruhe judges took the view that the burden of proof lay with the seller. In doing so, the BGH expanded the scope for shifting the burden of proof pursuant to sec. 476 of the Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch (BGB) [German Civil Code] to the benefit of the consumer. The Court thus stated that it could be assumed that the defect had been present to some extent at the time the vehicle was purchased. It concluded that the dealer needed to demonstrate that the defect was not yet present at the time of the sale.

In the other case, the clutch pedal of a used car began to get stuck shortly after the vehicle was purchased, with the result that it needed to be returned to its initial position after being engaged. The buyer brought the vehicle to the dealer’s garage. However, the defect was not present during a test drive and the dealer therefore saw no reason to carry out repairs. Not long thereafter, the pedal began to get stuck again. Because the dealer had not indicated that it was prepared to carry out repairs, the buyer decided to rescind the purchase agreement.

The BGH held that the rescission of the purchase agreement had been justified, even without setting a deadline for performing remedial work. The Court went on to say that despite the fact that the defect was only present sporadically, it had a big impact on the vehicle’s roadworthiness. It was said that this kind of malfunction significantly increased the risk of an accident occurring. Thus, the dealer had not satisfied the consumer’s demand to remove the defect.

If disputes arise relating to a purchase agreement, lawyers who are versed in the fields of commercial law and sale of goods law can offer advice.

GRP Rainer LLP www.grprainer.com/en/ is an international firm of lawyers and tax advisors who are specialists in commercial law. The firm counsels commercial and industrial companies and corporations, as well as associations, small- and mid-sized businesses, self-employed freelancers and private individuals worldwide from offices Cologne, Berlin, Bonn, Dusseldorf, Frankfurt, Hamburg, Munich, Stuttgart and London UK.

Contact Michael Rainer
Lawyer, Managing Partner

GRP Rainer LLP
Gürzenich-Quartier
Augustinerstraße 10
50667 Cologne
Germany

Phone: +49 221-27 22 75-0
info@grprainer.com
www.grprainer.com/en

This release was published on openPR.

Permanent link to this press release:

Copy
Please set a link in the press area of your homepage to this press release on openPR. openPR disclaims liability for any content contained in this release.

You can edit or delete your press release Remedying defects and shifting the burden of proof: BGH bolsters buyers’ rights here

News-ID: 415610 • Views: 1976

More Releases from GRP Rainer LLP

GRP Rainer Rechtsanwälte – Experience in establishing companies
Choosing the right corporate form when establishing a company can contribute a great deal to the economic success of the business. We at the commercial law firm GRP Rainer Rechtsanwälte advise numerous businesses on company formation and takeovers as well as in the event of a change of partners or shareholders. In our experience, the partners or shareholders frequently neglect one critical point amidst all the euphoria: choosing the right corporate
OLG Köln: Will written with non-dominant hand valid
It is possible for a will to be valid even if it was written with the hand one does not normally write with. That was the verdict of the Oberlandesgericht (OLG) Köln [Higher Regional Court of Cologne] in its ruling of August 3, 2017 (Az.: 2 Wx 149/17). In addition to preparing a notarized will, a testamentary disposition can also be handwritten. To this end, the will needs to be written
OLG Köln: Only serious misconduct justifies withdrawal from contract of inherit …
Apart from a will, it is also possible to prepare a contract of inheritance as a way of organizing one’s estate. It should be noted, however, that a contract of inheritance has a significantly stronger binding effect. In the absence of a will or contract of inheritance, the rules of intestate succession apply automatically following the death of the testator. If these run contrary to the testator’s wishes, a testamentary disposition
Commercial agent’s claim for compensation following voluntary termination
A commercial agent may even be entitled to compensation if he or she voluntarily issues notice of termination. However, the company’s conduct needs to give rise to legitimate grounds for termination for this to happen. When a commercial agency agreement is brought to an end, the commercial agent often has a right to compensation. This is because the company in a lot of cases continues to profit from the client contacts

All 5 Releases


More Releases for BGH

Hydroponic Equipment Market Size to 2023 Focusing on General Hydroponics, Botani …
Hydroponic Equipment market analysis mainly introduces the changing market dynamics in terms of covering all details inside analysis and opinion, volume and value market share by players, by regions, by product type, by consumers and their price change details, cost/revenue structure. Additionally, the analysis of Hydroponic Equipment offers a detailed breakdown of key market growth drivers and limitation along with impact analysis of the same. ICR World’s Hydroponic Equipment market research
Global Bright steel bar market 2017 - Omega Bright Steel, BGH Edelstahl, Midland …
Apex Market Reports, recently published a detailed market research study focused on the "Bright steel bar Market" across the global, regional and country level. The report provides 360° analysis of "Bright steel bar Market" from view of manufacturers, regions, product types and end industries. The research report analyses and provides the historical data along with current performance of the global Bright steel bar industry, and estimates the future trend of
Insolvency: BGH bolsters creditors‘ rights
Good news for creditors of an insolvent business partner: In its ruling of June 22, 2017, the Bundesgerichtshof (BGH), Germany’s Federal Supreme Court, has bolstered their rights when contesting a debtor’s transactions in insolvency proceedings (Az.: IX ZR 111/14). According to insolvency avoidance law, the insolvency administrator can reclaim payments made by the insolvent debtor from the period prior to insolvency. This has resulted in legal uncertainty for payees and in
BGH: Health claims in relation to mineral water need to comply with the Health C …
Health claims in relation to mineral water need to be consistent with the Health Claims Regulation. This was confirmed by the Bundesgerichtshof (BGH), Germany’s Federal Supreme Court, in its ruling of January 30, 2017 (Az.: I ZR 257/15). Advertising featuring health claims pertaining to mineral water also needs to adhere to the requirements set out in the Health Claims Regulation. That was the verdict of the Bundesgerichtshof with respect to an
BGH: Notarized agreement decisive, not the draft agreement
In cases of doubt, it is the notarized agreement that counts and not a draft contract whose content deviates from the former. That was the verdict of the Bundesgerichtshof (BGH), Germany’s Federal Supreme Court, in its judgment of June 10, 2016 (Az.: V ZR 295/14). GRP Rainer Lawyers and Tax Advisors in Cologne, Berlin, Bonn, Düsseldorf, Frankfurt, Hamburg, Munich, Stuttgart and London conclude: A purchase agreement for real estate needs
Eye-catching advertising featuring misleading guarantee promises
Advertising featuring a guarantee can be misleading if the guarantee promise is linked to conditions that are not clearly visible to consumers. That was the verdict of the Landgericht (LG) Frankfurt [Regional Court of Frankfurt]. GRP Rainer Lawyers and Tax Advisors in Cologne, Berlin, Bonn, Düsseldorf, Frankfurt, Hamburg, Munich, Stuttgart and London conclude: Clear guidelines relating to what is termed “Blickfangwerbung” (attention-grabbing/eye-catching advertising) had already been set out by the Bundesgerichtshof