openPR Logo
Press release

NYS Approves Pesticide Despite Unresolved Health Risks

01-10-2006 08:37 AM CET | Energy & Environment

Press release from: Fluoride Action Network

Fluoride Action Network (FAN) urges the NYS Bureau of Pesticides to rescind their recent approval of a new food fumigant pesticide, sulfuryl fluoride, because serious health risks, raised by environmental groups, remain unanswered by the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

In a November 28, 2005 letter to Dow AgroSciences, Maureen Serafini, Director, NYS Bureau of Pesticides, approved sulfuryl fluoride (ProFume®) fumigant on all processed foods and a large number of raw food commodities in New York. These are the foods most Americans eat.

In response, FAN’s Pesticide Project Director, Ellen Connett, requested Director Serafini to revoke this approval.

On January 4, 2006, Connett sent a letter to Director Serafini to inform her that three advocacy groups have raised serious concerns about the inherent dangers of sulfuryl fluoride’s use as a food fumigant. These issues have been presented to the EPA on three separate occasions, beginning in 2002, and remain unresolved.

The three groups — Fluoride Action Network, the Environmental Working Group and Beyond Pesticides — are seeking a resolution of these issues with EPA in a process known as an evidentiary hearing.

According to Connett, “An evidentiary hearing is the only legal recourse available to the public to challenge EPA’s wrongful approval of a pesticide. We fully expect that EPA will grant this hearing.”

At EPA’s request, the three groups clarified their issues in a December 2005 submission in preparation for the hearing. Forty eight (48) issues were identified in this submission, which was also sent to Director Serafini on 1/04/06.

“We expect Director Serafini to understand the serious nature of the issues raised and the procedural process the three advocacy groups are involved in. If she does, she will revoke her approval of sulfuryl fluoride as a food fumigant until these issues are resolved,” said Connett.

Because sulfuryl fluoride breaks down to fluoride in the human body, fluoride is the endpoint of toxicological concern. In their approval, EPA approved the highest levels of fluoride residues in food in US history. Fluoride is persistent and bio-accumulates in the human body.

Inhalation tests with all animal species exposed to sulfuryl fluoride revealed severe harm to the brain. Of particular concern was the finding of holes (vacuolation) in the white matter of the brain, and an abnormal softening (malacia) and cell death (necrosis) of brain tissue.

EPA’s first-time approval of sulfuryl fluoride as a food fumigant was in January 2004. A condition attached to EPA’s approval was that Dow had to perform an inhalation development neurotoxicity (DNT) study with rats “to more clearly and fully characterize the potential for neurotoxic effects in young animals.” In fact, EPA also stated that a DNT study was necessary in 2001, 2002 and 2005.

However, in the November 28 letter that Director Serafini wrote to Dow, she noted that Dow told her Bureau that EPA waived this study. It was Director Serafini’s letter that informed the public of this development, not the US EPA.

“US EPA is obligated to publish Dow’s request for a waiver of conditions, and the Agency’s response to it, in the Federal Register. If Director Serafini is correct, then EPA has not yet met its obligations to inform the public on this critical issue,” said Connett.

“We are concerned to find that Director Serafini was willing to accept the waiver of such a critical study. The three advocacy groups are requesting more relevant DNT studies to characterize the risks to cognitive function and the central nervous system, and we hope that Director Serafini will join with us in making sure these tests are performed,” said Connett. “The pesticide community is well aware of a study published in 1998 that reported subclinical effects on the central nervous system of workers using sulfuryl fluoride in non-food fumigation scenarios,” said Connett.

Among the many issues that the three groups raised to EPA:

• Too many Americans, especially children, are currently receiving too much fluoride – even by EPA’s own standards. There is, therefore, no safe room for additional exposures.

• EPA set an allowable dosage of fluoride for infants that is five times higher than for adults. This is unprecedented in EPA’s history and disregards EPA’s mandate, under the Food Quality Protection Act, to be more protective of a child’s exposure to pesticides, not less.

• In approving Dow’s request, EPA ignored all research published after 1985, choosing to rely instead on an antiquated 20-year-old standard which considers it safe for 40% of children to develop moderate to severe dental fluorosis (a brown and black staining of teeth, with pitting and erosion of enamel).

• New research indicating that low levels of fluoride can damage the brain, the bones, the kidneys, and other tissues, is currently being reviewed by the National Research Council (NRC). The NRC is expected to release its report (The Toxicologic Risk of Fluoride in Drinking Water) in 2006. EPA rushed approval to give Dow what it wanted, without waiting for the NRC report.

See

• January 4, 2006, letter from FAN’s Pesticide Project to the NY Bureau of
Pesticides requesting revocation of its approval of sulfuryl fluoride
(ProFume®) as a food fumigant.
http://www.fluorideaction.org/pesticides/sf.jan.4.2006.letter.to.nys.serafin
i.pdf

• November 28, 2005, letter from Director of NY Bureau of Pesticides to
Dow approving use of sulfuryl fluoride (ProFume®).
http://www.fluorideaction.org/pesticides/profume.nys.registration.05.pdf

• December 16, 2005, submission to US EPA: Issues for an Evidentiary
Hearing Concerning Sulfuryl Fluoride Tolerances
http://www.fluorideaction.org/pesticides/sf.submission.12-16-05.pdf

• Calvert GM et al (1998). Health effects associated with sulfuryl
fluoride and methyl bromide exposure among structural fumigation workers.
American Journal of Public Health 88(12): 1774-80. December.

• Fluoride Action Network Pesticide Project
http://www.fluoridealert.org/f-pesticides.htm

***
The Fluoride Action Network is an international organization comprised of groups and individuals broadening public awareness about fluoride.

PO Box 5111
Burlington VT 05402

Contact:
Ellen Connett, Pesticide Project Director
Fluoride Action Network Pesticide Project
315-379-9200 or pesticides@fluoridealert.org


Media Director: carol@fluoridealert.org

This release was published on openPR.

Permanent link to this press release:

Copy
Please set a link in the press area of your homepage to this press release on openPR. openPR disclaims liability for any content contained in this release.

You can edit or delete your press release NYS Approves Pesticide Despite Unresolved Health Risks here

News-ID: 2865 • Views: 1877

More Releases from Fluoride Action Network

Prominent Toxicologist Urges Communities to Stop Fluoridation – Citing Adverse …
“Risks of ingesting fluoride include lowered IQs and increased ADHD and hypothyroidism rates,” reports Steven G. Gilbert, PhD, DABT, Director and Founder of the Institute of Neurotoxicology and Neurological Disorders and affiliate professor at the University of Washington School of Public Health in “Fluoride Ingestion: Connecting the Dots for Health,” (May 1, 2019). He writes, between “2017 - 2019, high quality studies confirm lowering IQ at common [fluoride] exposure levels.” A
Fluoride and Organized Dentistry: Big Losers this Election Day
Fifty-three cities rejected fluoridation in referenda held in four states on November 4, 2008, according to the Fluoride Action Network (FAN). Lobbied by the Nebraska Dental Association and supported by the American Dental Association (ADA), the Nebraska legislature passed a law in April 2008, over the Governor’s veto, to require all Nebraska cities with populations over 1,000 to add fluoride chemicals into water supplies unless cities opt-out by 2010.
End Fluoridation, say 600 Physicians, Dentists, Scientists, and Environmentalist …
In a statement released August 9, 2007, over 600 dentists, physicians, scientists and environmentalists urge Congress to stop water fluoridation until Congressional hearings are conducted. They cite new scientific evidence that fluoridation, long promoted to fight tooth decay, is ineffective and has serious health risks. (http://www.fluorideaction.org/statement.august.2007.html) Signers include a Nobel Prize winner, three members of the prestigious 2006 National Research Council (NRC) panel that reported on fluoride’s toxicology, two officers in
Fluoride Foes Win the Year - Scientifically and Politically
Fluoride, added to water supplies, is touted as a tooth decay preventive. Science increasingly shows fluoridation is ineffective, harmful and a waste of money. But the politics of organized dentistry keeps fluoridated water flowing. Last year, 2005, was a very successful year for the Fluoride Action Network (FAN) and their affiliated groups for getting the truth out about the harmful effects of fluoride and bringing negative fluoride science to the

All 5 Releases


More Releases for EPA

Global DHA and EPA Products Market Analysis by 2020-2025
Scope of the Report: The global DHA and EPA Products market size is expected to gain market growth in the forecast period of 2020 to 2025, with a CAGR of xx%% in the forecast period of 2020 to 2025 and will expected to reach USD xx million by 2025, from USD xx million in 2019. Market segmentation DHA and EPA Products market is split by Type and by Application. For the period 2015-2025,
Global EPA and DHA Industry Research Analysis by 2020- 2025
This report also researches and evaluates the impact of Covid-19 outbreak on the EPA and DHA industry, involving potential opportunity and challenges, drivers and risks. We present the impact assessment of Covid-19 effects on EPA and DHA and market growth forecast based on different scenario (optimistic, pessimistic, very optimistic, most likely etc.).   Scope of the Report: The report presents the market outlook for the Indian Phospho Gypsum product from the year 2019 to
EPA & DHA Omega-3 Industry Outlook and Forecast 2020-2025
This report also researches and evaluates the impact of Covid-19 outbreak on the EPA & DHA Omega-3 industry, involving potential opportunity and challenges, drivers and risks. We present the impact assessment of Covid-19 effects on EPA & DHA Omega-3 and market growth forecast based on different scenario (optimistic, pessimistic, very optimistic, most likely etc.).   Global Info Research offers a latest published report on EPA & DHA Omega-3 Market Analysis and Forecast 2019-2025 delivering key insights and providing a
T&D A/C Adapters Comply with New EPA Regulations
Japan’s #1 Temperature Datalogger Manufacturer CHESTERLAND, OH—April 18, 2016 Effective last month, the EPA has enacted a new efficiency regulation concerning wall transformers. In order to comply with this regulation, TandD has changed all of their A/C Adapter model numbers. To help ease this transition, TandD has published a chart showing their current model numbers and the new model numbers for the A/C Adapters. You can find the chart here: http://www.tandd.com/support/other/other_acadapter.html. At
New US EPA Proposal for Notification Regarding Dangerous Chemicals
The five classes of compound targeted for significant new use requirements under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) are polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs), benzidine-based chemical substances, di-n-pentyl phthalate (DnPP), C12-C13 chlorinated alkanes and hexabromocyclododecanes (HBCDs). Once the EPA determines that a use of a chemical substance is a significant new use, TSCA section 5(a)(1)(B) requires manufacturers to submit a Significant New Use Notice (SNUN) to the EPA at least 90
EPA Accuses Florida City of Violating Asbestos Regulations
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has informed the officials of Marco Island, a city in southwest Florida that it violated six asbestos-related regulations in the course of reconstructing a roadway in 2006. Asbestos is a dangerous mineral that can lead to the development of cancers such as lung cancer and malignant mesothelioma. Asbestos fibers can remain suspended in air for long periods and are not visible to the human