BAG on collective redundancies and consultation process
GRP Rainer Lawyers and Tax Advisors in Cologne, Berlin, Bonn, Düsseldorf, Frankfurt, Hamburg, Munich, Stuttgart and London conclude: According to employment law, the employer is obligated to consult the works council before collective redundancies take place. If the works council no longer indicates a willingness to continue to negotiation on measures to prevent or limit collective redundancies, the employer can consider the consultation process pursuant to sec 17(2) of the KSchG to have come to an end. That was the verdict of the Bundesarbeitsgericht (BAG), Germany’s Federal Labour Court, in its ruling of September 22 (Az.: 2 AZR 276/16).
In the instant case before the BAG, the defendant had rendered services at an airport. It only had one client, which terminated all orders with effect from the end of March 2015. Following the failure of an internal attempt to balance interests, the defendant initiated a consultation process pursuant to sec 17(2) of the KSchG. In January, the decision was made to suspend business operations at the end of March. This was followed by notice of collective redundancies and the termination of all employment contracts. Several months later, another consultation process and discussions with the works council began regarding the possibility of resuming business operations. However, the employer felt that this would only be possible following a reduction in wages and salaries. The works council was apparently unwilling to allow this to happen. Consequently, notice of collective redundancies was reissued and the remaining employment contracts terminated.
Th BAG held that the first notice of collective redundancies had been ineffective, because the state of the discussions with the works council had not been accurately reflected in the notice of collective redundancies. The second notice of redundancies, on the other hand, had indeed been effective. The Court ruled that the consultation process had been conducted properly, including with regards to the relevant requirements under European Union law. It went on to say that the works council had received all of the necessary information and had the opportunity to influence the decision. Due to the fact that the works council did not indicate a willingness to continue negotiating, the negotiations could be seen as having failed. The Court stated that the works council was then properly informed about the intention to suspend business operations and the conciliation board was contacted after the negotiations failed.
When it comes to matters pertaining to dismissals as well as other issues relating to employment law, employers can turn to lawyers who are versed in the field of employment law.
GRP Rainer LLP www.grprainer.com/en/ is an international firm of lawyers and tax advisors who are specialists in commercial law. The firm counsels commercial and industrial companies and corporations, as well as associations, small- and mid-sized businesses, self-employed freelancers and private individuals worldwide from offices Cologne, Berlin, Bonn, Dusseldorf, Frankfurt, Hamburg, Munich, Stuttgart and London UK.
Contact Michael Rainer
Lawyer, Managing Partner
GRP Rainer LLP
Phone: +49 221-27 22 75-0
This release was published on openPR.
Permanent link to this press release:
Please set a link in the press area of your homepage to this press release on openPR. openPR disclaims liability for any content contained in this release.
You can edit or delete your press release BAG on collective redundancies and consultation process here
News-ID: 407207 • Views: 2499
More Releases from GRP Rainer LLP
GRP Rainer Rechtsanwälte – Experience in establishing companies
Choosing the right corporate form when establishing a company can contribute a great deal to the economic success of the business. We at the commercial law firm GRP Rainer Rechtsanwälte advise numerous businesses on company formation and takeovers as well as in the event of a change of partners or shareholders. In our experience, the partners or shareholders frequently neglect one critical point amidst all the euphoria: choosing the right corporate
OLG Köln: Will written with non-dominant hand valid
It is possible for a will to be valid even if it was written with the hand one does not normally write with. That was the verdict of the Oberlandesgericht (OLG) Köln [Higher Regional Court of Cologne] in its ruling of August 3, 2017 (Az.: 2 Wx 149/17). In addition to preparing a notarized will, a testamentary disposition can also be handwritten. To this end, the will needs to be written
OLG Köln: Only serious misconduct justifies withdrawal from contract of inherit …
Apart from a will, it is also possible to prepare a contract of inheritance as a way of organizing one’s estate. It should be noted, however, that a contract of inheritance has a significantly stronger binding effect. In the absence of a will or contract of inheritance, the rules of intestate succession apply automatically following the death of the testator. If these run contrary to the testator’s wishes, a testamentary disposition
Commercial agent’s claim for compensation following voluntary termination
A commercial agent may even be entitled to compensation if he or she voluntarily issues notice of termination. However, the company’s conduct needs to give rise to legitimate grounds for termination for this to happen. When a commercial agency agreement is brought to an end, the commercial agent often has a right to compensation. This is because the company in a lot of cases continues to profit from the client contacts