Nassau County Criminal Defense Lawyer Russ Kofman Explains the Difference Between Detained and Arrested in New York

Nassau County criminal defense lawyer Russ Kofman (https://www.lebedinkofman.com/detained-vs-arrested-in-new-york/) of Lebedin Kofman LLP explains the key differences between detainment and arrest in New York. These two legal scenarios, often confused, represent distinct processes that carry different implications for an individual's rights and freedoms. Detainment involves temporary restrictions imposed by law enforcement based on reasonable suspicion, while an arrest signifies a formal action supported by probable cause and typically results in criminal charges. Understanding the difference is crucial when dealing with law enforcement encounters.

A detainment occurs when law enforcement temporarily restricts an individual's movements to investigate potential criminal activity or prevent an imminent crime. It is not as severe as an arrest but still limits a person's freedom of movement and imposes certain legal obligations on officers. Nassau County criminal defense lawyer Russ Kofman notes that "detainment requires reasonable suspicion, allowing law enforcement to hold someone briefly for questioning or limited investigation." During this time, officers may ask questions or conduct a brief pat-down search for weapons if they suspect a potential danger. Detainment must be short and specific to the officer's suspicions, and once those suspicions are resolved, the individual must be released unless further evidence supports an arrest.

An arrest, on the other hand, involves taking an individual into custody based on probable cause. This requires a higher standard of evidence than reasonable suspicion. Probable cause exists when facts and circumstances would lead a reasonable person to believe that a crime has been committed and that the individual in question is responsible. Nassau County criminal defense lawyer Russ Kofman emphasizes that "an arrest typically results in formal charges, the loss of freedom, and potentially severe legal consequences." During an arrest, the individual's rights are more explicitly engaged, including the right to be informed of the charges and to receive a reading of Miranda rights, which include the right to remain silent and the right to legal representation.

The distinction between reasonable suspicion and probable cause is a defining factor. Reasonable suspicion, which supports a detainment, is a lower standard and is based on specific, articulable facts that suggest involvement in criminal activity. In contrast, probable cause, required for an arrest, involves stronger evidence and a more definitive belief that the individual has committed a crime. For example, an officer may detain someone briefly to question them about suspicious activity but cannot make an arrest without evidence supporting a clear connection to a criminal act.

Legal protections differ between detainment and arrest. During detainment, the law allows only limited actions by officers, such as questioning and a brief pat-down for weapons if there is reasonable suspicion of danger. A full search of the person or their belongings typically requires an arrest supported by probable cause. Arrests grant officers the authority to conduct broader searches related to the suspected crime, including searching the individual and their immediate surroundings to preserve evidence or ensure safety. These actions are subject to constitutional protections, including those under the Fourth Amendment, which guards against unreasonable searches and seizures.

Law enforcement officers must inform individuals of the reason for a detention or arrest. The legal principle ensures accountability and transparency, allowing the individual to understand the situation and act accordingly. While officers may delay this explanation in cases of safety concerns, they are required to disclose the reasons once those concerns are resolved. Failing to do so or extending a detainment unreasonably without establishing probable cause can render the officer's actions unlawful.

Both detainments and arrests can have lasting consequences. Detainment, while often temporary, can cause stress, reputational harm, and potential civil rights violations. In cases where detainments are prolonged without cause or involve misconduct, individuals may have legal grounds to challenge the actions in court. Arrests, being more formal, carry significant legal implications, including potential criminal charges, incarceration, and a criminal record. These consequences can affect employment opportunities, housing prospects, and social relationships, even if charges are later dismissed.

Knowing one's rights during a detention or arrest is essential. Individuals have the right to remain silent during both processes and can refuse searches unless law enforcement has the appropriate legal standard to justify them. If a detention or arrest occurs, seeking legal counsel is the most effective way to address any potential rights violations and build a defense against any criminal charges. Legal representation ensures that law enforcement actions are reviewed for compliance with constitutional standards and provides an opportunity to challenge any unlawful actions or evidence obtained improperly.

Russ Kofman advises individuals to take action to protect their rights when facing detention or arrest, noting that "violations of rights during these processes can lead to legal consequences for law enforcement and impact the outcome of any criminal case." Legal counsel can provide guidance on appropriate actions, including whether to challenge the validity of the detention or arrest in court or negotiate with prosecutors to secure favorable outcomes.

Understanding the distinctions between detainment and arrest helps clarify the rights and responsibilities of all parties involved. A deeper awareness of the standards of reasonable suspicion and probable cause underscores the importance of lawful conduct by law enforcement and the protection of individual freedoms.

For those detained or arrested in New York, consulting with a skilled Nassau County criminal defense lawyer can be a critical step toward resolving the situation effectively. Russ Kofman and the team at Lebedin Kofman LLP offer comprehensive legal support to ensure the protection of rights during every stage of the legal process. Contact the firm today at (516) 212-4209 to schedule a consultation.

About Lebedin Kofman LLP:

Lebedin Kofman LLP is a New York-based law firm widely experienced in criminal defense and civil rights litigation. With a focus on safeguarding client rights, the firm provides personalized legal representation tailored to the unique needs of each case. Russ Kofman and his team are dedicated to achieving the best possible outcomes for their clients.

Embeds:

Youtube Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h0KwpcBPsyY

GMB: https://www.google.com/maps?cid=258186473269305515

Email and website

Email: info@lebedinkofman.com

Website: https://www.lebedinkofman.com/nassau-county-criminal-lawyer/

Media Contact
Company Name: Lebedin Kofman LLP
Contact Person: Russ Kofman
Email:Send Email [https://www.abnewswire.com/email_contact_us.php?pr=nassau-county-criminal-defense-lawyer-russ-kofman-explains-the-difference-between-detained-and-arrested-in-new-york]
Phone: (516) 212-4209
Address:600 Old Country Rd # 205
City: Garden City
State: New York 11514
Country: United States
Website: https://www.lebedinkofman.com/nassau-county-criminal-lawyer/



This release was published on openPR.